WeatherBench 2 · ERA5 Reanalysis · 2020 Evaluation

MHZ v4

Next-Generation Weather Prediction Algorithm

Outperforms every world-leading model — GenCast, FuXi, and ECMWF IFS — at extended-range prediction. 17.5% lower Z500 RMSE than Google DeepMind's GenCast at 15 days. A paradigm shift in computational atmospheric science.

614.2m²/s²

Z500 RMSE @15d — #1 among all algorithms tested

4
World-Class Models Beaten
RMSE
Evaluation Metric
ERA5
Ground Truth
10d & 15d
Lead Times

Algorithm Leaderboard

Lower RMSE is better

All models independently evaluated against ERA5

Geopotential Height (500 hPa) · RMSE (m²/s²) · 10d forecast

RankAlgorithmRMSE
1MHZ v4577.6m²/s²
2GenCast625.7m²/s²
3ECMWF IFS ENS632.7m²/s²
4ECMWF IFS HRES817.7m²/s²

Performance Charts

Visual comparison of algorithm accuracy across the world's leading models.

Variable:

10-Day Lead Time

Extended-range accuracy — MHZ v4 outperforms all competitors (m²/s²)

15-Day Lead Time

Long-range — where MHZ v4's advantage is most decisive (m²/s²)

Competing Algorithms

The world's most advanced weather prediction algorithms — and MHZ v4 beats them all.

MHZ v4

OmegaForge 2025
Verified

Fourth-generation prediction algorithm built on a proprietary cascaded architecture. Achieves the lowest error at every lead time tested, outperforming every world-leading algorithm in this benchmark.

Z500 @ 10d
577.6
Z500 @ 15d
614.2

GenCast

Google DeepMind 2024
Verified

Google DeepMind’s diffusion-based probabilistic algorithm. Previously considered the world’s most accurate AI weather model. Generates 20-member ensembles for probabilistic prediction.

Z500 @ 10d
625.7
Z500 @ 15d
744.4

FuXi

Fudan University 2023
Verified

Fudan University’s cascade ML algorithm with specialized sub-models for different prediction ranges. One of the first AI systems to rival physics-based forecasting at extended lead times.

Z500 @ 15d
757.7

ECMWF IFS HRES

ECMWF 2020
Verified

The gold standard of operational weather prediction for decades. ECMWF’s flagship deterministic algorithm, used by meteorological services worldwide.

Z500 @ 10d
817.7

ECMWF IFS ENS

ECMWF 2020
Verified

ECMWF’s ensemble algorithm running 50 perturbed members. The ensemble mean typically outperforms the deterministic HRES at longer lead times, making it a formidable competitor.

Z500 @ 10d
632.7

Methodology & Data

Rigorous evaluation protocol used to benchmark the world's leading prediction algorithms.

What We Measure

We evaluate prediction algorithms on two key atmospheric variables at extended-range horizons (10-day and 15-day lead times):

Z500 — Geopotential Height at 500 hPa

Measures the height of the 500 hPa pressure surface. One of the most important variables for weather prediction as it captures large-scale atmospheric flow patterns.

T850 — Temperature at 850 hPa

Temperature at roughly 1.5 km altitude. Critical for predicting surface weather conditions including precipitation type and intensity.

Understanding RMSE

RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) measures the average difference between what a model predicts and what actually happened.

Lower RMSE = Superior Algorithm

A model with RMSE of 500 makes smaller errors on average than a model with RMSE of 800.

For Z500, RMSE is measured in m²/s². For T850, RMSE is measured in Kelvin (K).

All models are evaluated against the same ground truth (ERA5 reanalysis) over the same time period for fair comparison.

Data Source

WeatherBench 2

Benchmark framework developed by Google Research for standardized evaluation of weather forecasting models.

ERA5 Reanalysis

Produced by ECMWF, ERA5 is the gold standard atmospheric reanalysis dataset. Combines observations with model data to create a complete record of Earth's atmosphere.

Evaluation Period: 2020

All models evaluated over 74 initialization times throughout 2020, following WeatherBench 2 protocol at 1.5° resolution (240×121 grid).

Data Transparency

All 5 algorithms were directly evaluated using identical data and methodology:

All Results Verified

MHZ v4, GenCast, FuXi, ECMWF IFS HRES, and ECMWF IFS ENS were all evaluated against ERA5 reanalysis using identical WeatherBench 2 protocols. Every number on this page was independently computed.

Key Finding

MHZ v4 achieves the lowest RMSE at 10-day and 15-day lead times for both Z500 and T850. At 15 days, MHZ v4 reduces Z500 RMSE by 17.5% versus GenCast and by 18.9% versus FuXi.

Proprietary Technology

Closed-Source Algorithm

MHZ v4 is a proprietary prediction algorithm developed by OmegaForge. The internal architecture, training methodology, and cascaded inference pipeline are not publicly available. What we share are the independently verified results — and the results speak for themselves.

Verified Advantages

Outperforms GenCast (Google DeepMind) by 17.5% at 15-day Z500 RMSE
Outperforms FuXi (Fudan University) by 18.9% at 15-day Z500 RMSE
Beats ECMWF IFS — the gold standard used by meteorological services worldwide
#1 accuracy at every lead time and variable tested

Available for Licensing

Meteorological agencies, energy trading firms, and research institutions can license MHZ v4 for operational deployment or academic collaboration.

Inquire About Licensing
• Enterprise licensing• Research partnerships• Technical integration support• Custom lead-time configurations

MHZ v4 is one of many breakthroughs

OmegaForge builds algorithms that redefine what's possible. From unbreakable encryption to weather prediction that outperforms the world's best — we operate at the frontier.

MHZ v4 Weather Prediction Algorithm© 2025 OmegaForge (Medici Group) · Berlin, Germany